Category Archives: Swale BC Planning

SBC REJECTS RESTAURANT IN A BLACK SHED

Tonight, SBC Planning Committee unanimously rejected the planning application for the conversion of the No 1 Black Shed on Standard Quay, into a windowless restaurant and museum, with a windowed gallery upstairs.

It was described by one councillor as a Red Herring; another replied that there should be no Red Herrings served there and another concluded that eating them in a windowless restaurant would not be to their taste, even though the only things left to be seen outside would be a few parked cars.

There was a reservation about the future of the shed were it not used as a restaurant; would the recently departed maritime activities return. The answer is, of course , yes, given the right management and pricing.

URGENT TONIGHT ALL POSSIBLE TO ATTEND SQ PLANNING MTG 7PM SWALE HS

WE URGENTLY NEED AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE TO GO TO THE PLANNING MEETING AT SWALE HOUSE TONIGHT AT 7.00pm.

ALTHOUGH NO-ONE CAN SPEAK, IT IS VITALLY IMPORTANT TO CONTINUE TO SHOW THE STRENGTH OF INTEREST, AND OPPOSITION, IN THIS MATTER.

AN APPEAL HAS BEEN MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, RT HON ERIC PICKLES MP, REQUESTING THAT HE CALLS IN THIS APPLICATION FOR HIS CONSIDERATION AND INSPECTION, AND THE SWALE PLANNING COMMITTEE HAS BEEN SO NOTIFIED.

STANDARD QUAY STORY

THE WAY IT WAS IN HISTORY

5_HISTORY S.QUAY

THE WAY IT WAS UNTIL 2011

STANDARD QUAY

THE WAY IT WAS PLANNED – AND STILL COULD BE

10_SQ VISION

THE WAY IT IS PLANNED - AS A CAR PARK

SQ Parking Drg-9609256

REMEMBER STANDARD QUAY

STANDARD QUAY rememberedSBC Planning Committee meets at 10.30 Monday 29th to find out what Standard Quay was all about, and could be again. We will be there to tell them.  All are welcome for support.

SQ Black Shed Restaurant- Decision deferred for Site Visit 29th 10.30am

At Thursday’s planning meeting, a decision was deferred until councillors had conducted a visit to Standard Quay. See this film for reactions after the meeting, with thanks to Richard Fleury;

http://www.thequayfilm.net/?cat=1

Anybody can attend and those who submitted comments will have received notice from Swale. However, to be effective, it is important that a limited number of informed representatives with prepared statements need to take the lead. It is also equally important to try to ensure that as many councillors as possible  attend, especially those who are not from Faversham.

So, an email to all the Planning Committee members saying it’s important to make the effort to go and see the Quay, and visualise it, not just as it is now but how it was until two years ago, and can be again. Give a link to the The Quay film, and ask them to look at it, and at this website.   Email addresses:

SQ AS YOU KNOW IT Going Going ……..on the 11th

ALL COMMENTS ON SQ SHOULD GO TO grahamthomas@swale.gov.uk

WORKING QUAY          OR            CAR PARK

SQ Parking Drg-9609256

Standard Quay Black Shed Planning Decision Thurs 11th April

Swale Council planners will decide the fate of Standard Quay on Thursday 11 April (7pm, Council Chamber).
The Planning Officer is recommending that the application for a Restaurant, Art Gallery and Function Room in the No1 Black Shed should be approved!
If plans for a restaurant (+97 parking places) are accepted, we will lose any chance to ever reinstate the historic boatyard at the Quay.
Only one person is allowed to speak, but public support at the meeting would be much appreciated, and if you have not yet written to Swale with your views, please do so now.
The ref no is SW/12/1523 AJS Case 01675
and emails can be sent to    grahamthomas@swale.gov.uk
You can view the actual plans on www.ukplanning.com/swale
Standard Quay has been used for traditional maritime activities for centuries – not only loading and unloading vessels – but barge-building and repair, shipwrighting, rigging, sail-making, engineering, block-making, maintenance and training. All this ended very recently when the whole site was acquired by a property developer. And all this will be lost – on our watch.
Putting a restaurant and car-park into the historic maritime buildings will blight the whole site as far as barge maintenance is concerned.
Please do what you can to help preserve Faversham’s remarkable maritime heritage – by writing now.
Thank you!

A Restaurant in the Black Shed at Standard Quay

A planning application has been made for a change of use of the No 1 Black Shed on Standard Quay. This changes the use from Workshops and Storage to a Restaurant and Cambria Visitor Centre downstairs and an Art Gallery/Function Room upstairs.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

If you wish to comment on this development you can do so directly on the UK Planning website (www.ukplanning.com/swale); use Reference SW/12/1523

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAThe application may be inspected at the Planning Services Department, Swale House, East Street, Sittingbourne, at 9.00am – 4.45pm Monday to Thursday and 9.00am – 4.15pm on Friday.

A copy will also be available for inspection at the Council Offices at Preston Street, Faversham Monday to Thursday 9.00am – 12.45pm; 1.30pm – 5.00pm and Friday at 9.00am – 12.45pm; 1.30pm – 4.30pm.

THE DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS IS NOW Tuesday 12th FEBRUARY

The principal issues that should be considered are;

1. that the application is premature in that it attempts to pre-empt the Creek Neighbourhood Plan that is being developed,

2. that it does not meet the criteria laid down in the current Local Plan and AAP2 for the use of Standard Quay.

Does the Town need another restaurant and can Abbey St and the Quay cope with the additional traffic and parking. It is clearly another nail in the coffin of the Quay as Maritime Heritage center. Once a restaurant is open in such a central position, it is virtually the end of boatbuilding and associated maritime trades. Gradually, working craft are being replaced by Houseboats. There are no boat repair facilities remaining nor the relevant craftsmen.

The modifications required to convert these simple buildings will irreversibly change them from simple artisan workshops and storage into modern and expensive buildings,  putting them forever out of reach of tradesmen and other maritime uses.

In February 2011 a Petition was signed by over 1500 people ;

Faversham Creek has been a centre for ship building and repair for more than 300 years.

In recent years Standard Quay has regenerated the heritage, skills and apprentice training of Faversham’s maritime craftsmen. It is the last stronghold of traditional barges in the South East of England. Standard Quay, on Faversham Creek’s unique historic waterway, is of national and European importance. This industry, jobs and heritage is now under immediate threat.

We, the undersigned, petition Swale Borough Council to protect, preserve and enhance Standard Quay and the Creek environment for the building, restoration, maintenance and berthing of traditional vessels by all means possible including:

1. Helping to secure the quayside, land and buildings at Standard Quay so that local maritime craftsmen can continue their traditional boatbuilding and apprentice training activities, and Faversham Creek can expand as a national centre for Thames Sailing barge berthing, repair and restoration.

2. A Guarantee that any future Faversham Creek Development Plan will specifically rule out any possibility of the historic Standard Quay site being developed inappropriately in future – for example for housing, restaurants, cafes, hotels, licensed premises and retail use.

3. Rejecting any proposed change of use for Standard Quay’s quayside buildings, so they can continue to be used for their traditional purposes by maritime craftsmen.

THE DEADLINE FOR COMMENT IS Tuesday 12th February

A Report on the Recent LEF

As now reported in both local papers, several members of the Trust went to the recent Local Engagement Forum meeting this month, and heard (among other things) a presentation by Mike Cosgrove giving his view of the emerging Neighbourhood Plan for the Creekside.  This was a useful talk as it laid out some of the background and the way the government expects the process to go forward.

He made it very clear that when this process reaches its Referendum stage next year, unless there is at least 50% endorsement of the Plan, it will fall away and we will have no plan – ie. any developer will be able to put in any proposal without guidelines in place, and our precious waterside sites will be unprotected. To us, this looks like a win-win for any developers: if their proposals are incorporated into the Neighbourhood Plan which is rejected as a result, they get a clear scope to proceed without a Plan in place.  Can this be right?

We were disappointed by the limited scope of the ‘vision’ for the Creek as he presented it – their ideal seemed to be creekside path and moorings, a maritime flavour to the development of the 100 housing units near the Creek, and marine twiddles on the buildings.  This looks very out-of-date and tame in comparison to our idea for the economic regeneration of the Creekside especially in the Basin, and with ongoing commercial benefits for the whole town.  We will have to make our case more clearly.

We were also disappointed by his replies to questions asking when the public responses to the May consultation exercise would be published (as promised). It is very odd that they have not, and apparently do not wish to publish the result of this survey.  Mike Cosgrove said 900, then 800, people had taken part – so why can we not see what everyone said?  We gave our opinions on the basis that they would publish the results.

There were some frustrated and angry questions put to the meeting, none of which reached any resolution.  Personally I deplore this raised-voice method of communication, but there is no doubt, there is a difference of opinion between some of the people facilitating the Plan process and a great body of local people.  This has to be resolved, and in detail. So much is at stake.

Griselda Mussett
Chairman, FCT

Interesting Response to Ordnance Wharf Proposal

This Application was withdrawn on 8th June although we were not told until the 13th June.

Letter to the Editor, Faversham News, 7 June 2010  -  ORDNANCE WHARF

We hope that Swale planners will have the sense to reject not only the current planning application for Ordnance Wharf [Gardner Digs, Faversham News, May 24] but also any future applications for housing on the site, even if they’re a lot better-looking than this one.

It’s not just about size and appearance (and there’s nothing inherently wrong with modern design: Faversham could do with some good 21st-century architecture and less of the usual pastiche). It’s about function.

Faversham Creek has the potential to be the town’s biggest asset. Our councillors should ensure that any waterside developments are for long-term community benefit – employment, visitor attractions, public spaces, flood prevention – rather than short-term private profit.

Let’s have no pretence that residential development here would serve a social purpose by fulfilling housing need. This is prime waterfront property for the privileged. Concreting over the Creekside and turning it into a dormitory estate will kill off any prospect of a living, working, interesting Creek. Housing on Ordnance Wharf in particular will stifle any development of maritime activities in the Creek basin.

This is not just speculative scaremongering. Your front-page story [End of an era as last dry dock goes, Faversham News, May 24] shows how it’s already happening. Standard Quay risks shooting itself in the foot with gentrification driving away the boatyard activities that are its lifeblood and its greatest attraction.

In response to the public consultation on the Faversham Creek Neighbourhood Plan, we suggested that the Creekside area should be zoned. In Zone 1 (fronting the Creek, including Ordnance Wharf and other sites around the basin) any development should be small-scale, low-rise and low-density, with plenty of open space and access to the waterfront – and it should be primarily for employment or public amenity. Residential development should be confined to Zone 2 (the rest of the area).

We further suggested that Swale should ring-fence s106/CIL receipts from any such developments for long-term investment in Faversham Creek, and that it should impose a requirement for zero- carbon housebuilding standards, making Faversham a centre of excellence for eco-design and construction.

While the consultation is still in progress, surely there should be a moratorium on any planning permission for Creekside housing developments – otherwise the bulldozers will have moved in before we have a chance to vote on the Neighbourhood Plan in the August 2013 referendum, making a complete nonsense of local democracy.

Hilary Whelan & Chris Berry Faversham